Layer 1 · Deep research, done by us
We own the deep work: in-depth research against your specific questions, full competitor briefs, and positioning your company in the market. This is where most of our time goes.
Competitive intelligence · Israeli B2B SaaS
We map the field.
You take the shot.
A managed competitive-intelligence service for Israeli B2B SaaS companies — continuous competitor profiles, a dated change log, and analysis tied to your own goal. The full record over time, not a snapshot.
The problem · 01
The map is always out of date.
Your competitors keep changing — pricing, positioning, messaging, hiring. A report commissioned once is a photograph of a market already in motion: accurate the day it was written, stale soon after. So the research gets redone from zero before every big decision, and nothing learned along the way accumulates.
The problem isn't finding information. It's that nobody is keeping the memory.
The method · 02
How we map your market.
01Survey — Continuous competitor profiles.
We maintain a living profile of every relevant competitor — positioning, pricing, messaging, hiring — kept current instead of rebuilt each time you need it.
02The record — A dated change log.
Every competitor move is recorded with a date and a source, drawn from public and licensed sources. When something changed, you can see exactly when — and check exactly where we saw it.
03The route — Analysis aimed at your goal.
We hold your vision, positioning and ideal customer profile alongside the market, so every insight arrives already pointed at what you're trying to win.
The map · 03
See the market move.
Drag the timeline. Each month the map shifts: competitors move, the log records it with a date and a source, and the open route to your objective is redrawn.
Illustrative example — fictional companies and data
Your position · relative to the objective
58%Baseline set at onboarding.
Read this example as text
A fictional nine-month record. Your position holds the lower left of the map; the objective sits at the far side. Three fictional competitors — A, B and C — move month by month, and the recommended route to the objective is redrawn as they do.
- January. No recorded changes. Route note: Direct route: the centre of the market is open. Your position relative to the objective: 58% of the route clear — Baseline set at onboarding.
- February. Competitor B: Rewrites its pricing page around usage-based tiers. (Public pricing page, Feb 11.) Your position relative to the objective: 56% of the route clear — Competitor B's pricing rewrite crowds your segment.
- March. Competitor A: Opens an enterprise sales role in Berlin. (Public job posting, Mar 04.) Route note: Competitor A is moving upmarket — the centre narrows. We route around it. Your position relative to the objective: 53% of the route clear — Competitor A's enterprise push narrows the centre.
- April. Competitor C: Repositions its homepage around compliance. (Company blog, Apr 22.) Your position relative to the objective: 52% of the route clear — Competitor C's compliance turn tightens the right lane.
- May. Competitor B: Ships single sign-on and announces it in its changelog. (Product changelog, May 16.) Route note: Competitor C turns toward compliance; the right lane holds. Your position relative to the objective: 55% of the route clear — Rerouted around Competitor A; ground recovered.
- June. No recorded changes. Your position relative to the objective: 56% of the route clear — Holding: no material moves this month.
- July. Competitor A: Announces a partnership with a licensed data vendor. (Press release, Jul 09.) Your position relative to the objective: 55% of the route clear — Competitor A's vendor partnership — watching the flank.
- August. Competitor C: Drops its free tier. (Public pricing page, Aug 27.) Route note: Competitor B has gone down-market — the centre reopens. Shortest route restored. Your position relative to the objective: 60% of the route clear — Competitor B leaves the centre; the route shortens.
- September. No recorded changes. Your position relative to the objective: 63% of the route clear — Centre open: closest position this period.
Open roles at each fictional competitor, by month:
| Competitor | JAN | FEB | MAR | APR | MAY | JUN | JUL | AUG | SEP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitor A | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Competitor B | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Competitor C | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
The difference · 04
A photo, or the film?
Deep-research prompts are genuinely good at the snapshot. The snapshot is not the market.
A one-off report, or one deep prompt
- Answers from a single moment
- Confidence high, sources optional
- Knows nothing about your company
- Starts from zero every time
Working with us
- Memory that accumulates month over month
- Every claim carries a source and a date — and when there is no source, we say so
- Your goal, positioning and ICP frame every insight
- Focused on the Israeli-European market
The engagement · 05
A service, shaped with you.
Every engagement starts with deep onboarding. We learn your vision and your position in the market, your internal knowledge, your architecture and how your technology works, and what genuinely sets it apart. Everything you share stays under a confidentiality agreement.
Layer 2 · Fast answers between deep dives
Between deep dives, you shouldn't have to wait for us. During onboarding we define your comparison axes together. From then on, you can get a quick brief on any company against yours, on those axes, and battlecards ready for your next sales or investor call — fast, on demand.
A battlecard is a one-page card per competitor — how they position, where they are strong, where they are exposed, and how to answer them. Every claim sourced and dated.
We work with a small number of companies at a time and build the method with them: what we track, what a brief contains, and the rhythm it arrives on are agreed with each partner, not imposed by a plan. A managed service, not software you have to run.
You bring the goal. We keep the field mapped around it.
About · 06
Who we are and how we work.
Behind the service is an AI-driven research system that runs several models and data systems in parallel and cross-checks them against each other. It builds a living profile and persona for every competitor and sets your company against them. We review every claim, with its source and date, before it reaches you.
Yoav Avraham
DevOps and platform engineer with five years in production infrastructure and deep knowledge of modern AI and competitive research. Owns the systems that keep every profile current and every claim traceable.
Nahar
DevOps Engineer specializing in end-to-end process automation-scaling GCP platforms, streamlining workflows, and a proven record powering competitor research.
Tell us what you're trying to win.
Write to us about your company and your market, and we'll set up a free consultation and scoping call. We answer personally.